1. The Defendants’ amounting to KRW 5,00,000 and its amount to the Plaintiff are KRW 5% per annum from April 19, 2016 to December 22, 2016.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a company running real estate brokerage business, etc., and the Defendants jointly owned with I enter into a lease agreement with regard to “all of the five-story H hotel in the real estate and the land located in the ethic City F, G, and the ground (hereinafter “the instant hotel”).

B. On August 23, 2014, the Plaintiff concluded a lease contract between the Defendants and I as to the hotel of this case (hereinafter “instant lease contract”) and a lease contract between the Defendants as to KRW 300 million, monthly rent, and KRW 26 million (excluding value-added tax) on September 16, 2014, and received the down payment (based on the modified contract) as of September 16, 2014, but did not pay any balance.

C. Article 8 of the instant lease agreement provides that “The real estate broker is not liable for the nonperformance of this contract by the lessor and the lessee. In addition, the brokerage commission is paid by both the parties to the contract at the same time as this contract is concluded, and the brokerage commission is paid even if this contract is invalidated, revoked or revoked without the intention or negligence of the broker.”

이 사건 임대차계약 체결 당시에 원고 소속 공인중개사가 작성하여 제공한 중개대상물 확인ㆍ설명서의 ‘⑩ 벽면 균열 및 누수’ 항목에는 ‘있음’ 란에 체크(√) 표시되어 있으나 그 위치 란은 공란으로 되어 있었고, ‘⑪ 중개수수료 및 실비의 금액과 산출내역’ 중 ‘중개수수료’ 란에는 ‘별도 협의하기로 함’이라고만 기재되어 있을 뿐 원, 피고들 사이에 중개수수료율이나 액수에 관하여 합의한 바는 없다.

E. I, against the Defendants, is a defect that can not be used normally due to water leakage on the wall of the restaurant and the multiple guest rooms in the hotel of this case.