1. The Defendants shall jointly and severally serve as the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 482,00,000 and the period from August 15, 2014 to October 14, 2014.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On May 21, 2014, the Plaintiff and Defendant B entered into a contract for the supply of goods with the content that the Plaintiff supplied Defendant B with the right of KRW 5.2 million in the election campaign bulletin book up to May 23, 2014 and that Defendant B shall pay KRW 517,00,000 in the price up to August 14, 2014 (hereinafter “instant contract”). At the time, Defendant C guaranteed the Plaintiff’s joint and several liability for the purchase of the goods.

B. Accordingly, the Plaintiff supplied Defendant B with the right of KRW 5.2 million for the election campaign bulletin book. On June 2014, the Plaintiff received KRW 35,000,000 out of the above price from Defendant B for the police officer.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 and 2 (including branch numbers for those with additional numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts, barring any special circumstance, the Defendants are obligated to pay to the Plaintiff 482,00,000 won for the remainder of the goods (i.e., KRW 517,00,000 - KRW 35,000,000) and damages for delay at each rate of 20% per annum prescribed by the Civil Act from August 15, 2014 to October 14, 2014, which is apparent that the duplicate of the complaint of this case was served on the Defendants.

B. As to this, the defendants asserted to the purport that the amount of the goods stipulated in the contract of this case unfairly excessive amount and thus the plaintiff's claim of this case is unjustifiable. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge this, and the defendants' above assertion is without merit.

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified.