1. The defendant shall receive KRW 250,000,000 from the plaintiffs, and at the same time real estate stated in the attached list to the plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On June 30, 2015, Nonparty D leased the instant real estate to the Defendant by setting the rental deposit of KRW 250,000,000, and by the lease period of August 23, 2017.

B. On April 10, 2017, the Plaintiffs succeeded to the status of a lessor by purchasing the instant real estate.

(Evidence) Evidence No. 1, No. 2, and the whole purport of the pleading

2. The parties' assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiffs asserted that the Defendant agreed to extend the lease period on October 27, 2017, with respect to the claim for the delivery of the instant real estate on the grounds of the expiration of the lease period.

B. It is insufficient to recognize the Defendant’s above assertion solely with the statement of No. 1.

C. The defendant asserts the return of 250,000,000 won of the rental deposit, and thus, this argument is with merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant is obligated to receive KRW 250,000 from the plaintiffs and deliver the real estate stated in the separate sheet to the plaintiffs. Thus, the plaintiffs' claim is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as they are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.