1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff's argument is the heir of the network AI who is Defendant H, I, J, K, and L.

On December 30, 1954, the Plaintiff was the heir of the deceased AG on December 17, 1964, and the Plaintiff was the heir of the deceased AG on December 17, 1964. The deceased Defendant M, N,O, G, Q, Q, R, M, T, M, M, X, X, Y, Z, AA, AB, and AC are the heir of the deceased AG.

In spite of the purchase of the AE 108.7 square meters from Jeonnam-gun, Jeonnam-gun (hereinafter “instant 2 land”), it did not make a registration.

The plaintiff purchased the land Nos. 1 and 2 from the network AI on December 22, 1968, but failed to transfer the registration.

The land No. 1 of this case was completed on June 8, 2006 by the Gwangju District Court No. 5090, the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the deceased B was completed on May 27, 2009 under the name of the defendant Fdong Association (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant Association") as the receipt No. 10966 on May 27, 2009.

The land No. 2 of this case was completed as the receipt No. 1929 on January 28, 2008 of the same support, and the registration of ownership transfer under the name of Defendant AJ was completed.

The defendant Dong Association newly constructed a building (village) listed in paragraph (1) of the attached Table No. 1 on the land of this case, and newly constructed a building (welfare center) listed in paragraph (2) of the attached Table No. 2 on the land of this case.

Since the registration of transfer of ownership under the name of the above network B, the defendant Dong Association, and the AJ is invalid, all of the registration of transfer of ownership is required to be cancelled, and it is necessary to remove since it was made without the right to use the community hall and the welfare center land.

Finally, the heir of the network AI should implement the registration procedure for transfer of ownership on the land Nos. 1 and 2 of this case to the Plaintiff on December 22, 1968.

2. First of all, the Plaintiff asserted that the land Nos. 1 and 2 of this case was purchased from the network AI, but there is no evidence to acknowledge it, and the Plaintiff asserts that the registration of transfer of ownership in the name of the network B, the Defendant Association, and the AJ is invalid.