logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 논산지원 2016.08.19 2016고단240
범인도피방조
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 9, 2016, at around 16:19, the Defendant driven a B rocketing car and proceeded to each agency on the road in front of the Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, the Defendant was negligent in driving the road on the front side of the west-gun, and caused injury to D (n, 4 years old) by shocking D (n, 4 years old) with the said D’s vehicle at the front side, resulting in an injury, such as the cutting of the inside and bottom of the floor necessary for approximately 4 weeks of treatment. Accordingly, the Defendant’s wife E, who was accompanied by the said vehicle, sent the said D to the emergency room of the Y-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun University Hospital.

On February 9, 2016, at the emergency room around 17:00, the Defendant: (a) received the report of the foregoing traffic accident; and (b) sent the police box G, etc. to the police box operator of the police station that granted the above traffic accident; (c) the Defendant “dices alcohol up to the previous new wall; and (d) took the sex funeral at the morning; and (c) was able to do so.

"The above E driven a vehicle involved in an accident" to the above police officer who was under the process of confirming the circumstances of the traffic accident, and the husband was on board the vehicle in question.

When making a false statement to the effect that “A driver was a houser.”

B was on board the chief commissioner.

“To observe the aforementioned E’s false statement, and after the completion of the emergency treatment of the above D, the aforementioned E was present at the traffic survey team of the police station assigned with the above E along with the traffic survey team of the police station assigned with the above E and was on the ground that the above E made the aforementioned false statement to the same effect, as

On February 11, 2016, the above E’s false statement was observed, and the E was summoned as a defendant of the above traffic accident to the traffic investigation team around February 11, 2016, and it was easy for the above E to have the Defendant, who is a criminal, escape.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Articles 151(1) and 32(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Reduction of assistance under the Criminal Act.

arrow