1. Defendant A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 800,000.

The above defendant did not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the father of Defendant B, Defendant B is the mother of Victim D and E, and Victim F is the mother of the said D and E.

On September 10, 2016, the victims found the main point of the “H” operated by Defendant B, who was in the king-si around 20:00, and had been in dispute with the recent text messages divided, Defendant A was able to get the arms of the victim E (34 tax) and his arms, and the victim D (33 years old) was able to sleep the left door of the victim D (33 years old), and was dried with the victim F (53 years old)’s right shoulder.

Defendant B continued to bring the victim F's cell phone to his cell phone, faced the victim F's chest part by being pushed down several times, boomed with the wall, flaping the victim D's head, flaping the victim E's head, flaping the victim E's upper arms and selling his arms.

As a result, the Defendants jointly put the victim F on the right side, the front part and the upper part of the pelvis, etc., which require approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim D, the victim D’s pelumumumumum in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, and the victim E’s pelumumumumum in need of approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of a witness I;

1. Partial statement of each protocol concerning the examination of suspect of the police against D or E;

1. Partial statements made to F in the police statement protocol;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (an investigation into submission of a report on diagnosis of damage suffered by each victims);

1. The Defendants: Article 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines

1. Defendants who aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The judgment of the Defendants and their defense counsel on the assertion of the Defendants and their defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act constitutes legitimate defense.