beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 46,884,543 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from March 10, 2017 to July 19, 2018.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. (1) Around August 2013, the Defendant was awarded a contract with the Plaintiff for the construction of a ventilation machine to the transformation room located on the rooftop of the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Logistics Complex (hereinafter “instant transformation room”).
(2) Since special high voltage electric installations, such as transformers, are installed in the substation, and high voltage currents came, the Defendant set up the substation of this case. On the rooftop entrance, the warning/special high voltage risk / no-entry prohibition phrase was put into the substation, and warning/special high voltage / non-related persons other than related persons, and/or high voltage / no-entry notice was attached to the passage into the substation of this case, and the entrance entrance was controlled around the substation of this case by attaching risk/special high voltage / special high voltage / special high voltage / high voltages respectively. However, the rooftop of the substation of this case was designated as a fire-fighting shelter, and the entrance was no choice but to open the entrance.
(3) On August 15, 2013, the Defendant’s representative director D arrived at the logistics warehouse along with E and F, a worker belonging to E and F, in order to perform the work to install a dyspathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathic spathics.
(4) Although D opened a door to the substation of this case, it did not open, and it did not open a door from F to a new door. However, D did not open.
around that time, E opened a door to the opposite side of the transformation room, and the door entered into the transformation room, and was faced with an accident that leads to high voltage currents.
(hereinafter “instant accident”). (5) The reason why the alteration room’s door was not set at the time of the instant accident is unknown, and D did not possess a special electricity-related certificate.
The Plaintiff entered the Defendant on May 15, 2013, which was three months before the date of the instant accident, and did not receive any particular safety education and did so with D.