logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2019.01.11 2018고정683
업무상횡령
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From April 22, 2017, the Defendant has been working as the president of the redevelopment project in the area B of Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, and has overall control over the business of raising and withdrawing funds of the association.

On May 8, 2017, a copy of the list of those present at the extraordinary general meeting to be selected as a contractor in 2016, a copy of the receipt certificate of the expenses of the meeting of those present at the extraordinary general meeting to be selected as a contractor in 2016, a copy of the list of those present at the annual meeting in 2017, a copy of the list of those present at the annual meeting in 2017, a copy of the written resolution of the annual meeting in 2017, and a copy of the written resolution of the annual meeting in 2017, which was not implemented within 15 days from C, who was prosecuted by the Ulsan District Court as a violation of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents of Ulsan District Prosecutors' Office Act (No. 2017 and No. 18629) on September 8, 2017, and the above summary order was issued in

The above request for formal trial is an individual case caused by the defendant's illegal act and is irrelevant to the normal performance of duties of the above union. Thus, the above request for formal trial shall not be used as a defendant's attorney at the expense of the above union.

Nevertheless, around October 2017, the Defendant entered into the instant delegation contract with the clients of the said association with respect to the claim for formal trial at the time of a judgment of innocence as to the said case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’s case’

As a result, the defendant embezzled 3.3 million won of the money of the above union in his occupational custody.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Witness F;

1. Documents on the delegation collection and receipt of the case, a copy of the name of the association, and the minutes of the board of directors of 25 persons;

1. An attorney-at-law who may disburse a report of investigation (a copy of the document of the case in which the defendant was subject to an oral disposition) at the expense of an organization;

arrow