1. For the plaintiffs:

A. Defendant G is indicated in the attached Form No. 3 of the real estate list No. 1, 1, 2, and 3.

The plaintiff's cause of the claim of this case is the same as the "the changed cause of claim" in the attached Form No. 1 to No. 28 (including the serial number), and it can be recognized by considering the whole purport of the pleading.

Therefore, the plaintiffs are obligated to indicate the following drawings among the real estate No. 3 listed in the attached Table 1's list (2), (2), (3), (4), (5), (8), (5), (5) area of the same drawings among the same real estate, (7), (8), (9), (3), (7), (1) area of the same drawings among the real estate listed in the attached Table 1's list, (3) area of the same drawings among the real estate listed in the attached Table 1's list: (1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (7), (9), (3) area of the "A" portion of the "A" among the real estate listed in the attached Table 1's list, on September 14, 2015, for each plaintiff's ownership transfer registration due to the completion of the prescriptive acquisition period on September 14, 2015, and (3), Defendant H, I, J, and K are obligated to return the plaintiffs' share of unjust enrichment on each of the real estate listed in attached No. 1's list 2.

As to this, Defendant G alleged that the right to claim for the transfer registration of ownership due to the completion of acquisition by prescription of the Plaintiffs has expired ten years. However, the above assertion is rejected on September 14, 2015, and the filing date of the instant lawsuit was June 12, 2018.

Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified, and all of them are accepted.