A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Punishment of the crime

On April 16, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a group, deadly weapons, etc.) at the Daejeon District Court on April 16, 2015, and completed the execution of the sentence in the branch of the Daejeon Prison.

On January 10, 2018, the Defendant was in the Seo-gu Daejeon apartment L, Seo-gu, Daejeon, where D, a wife of a de facto marital relationship, around 22:30, was living.

In this late night, the victim N(46 tax ) first considered M with M was drinking together with the above D, and the victim's face was 2 times, and the victim's head was satisfy, which is a dangerous object in the surrounding area, one time, and there was no head open within 2 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police statement made against N or M;

1. The criminal place and written petition;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquiries, such as criminal history;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. 작량 감경 형법 제 53 조, 제 55조 제 1 항 제 3호 피고인 및 변호인의 주장에 대한 판단 피고인 및 변호인은, 피해자의 얼굴을 손으로 때린 사실은 있으나, 소 주병으로 피해자의 머리를 때린 사실은 없다고 주장하므로 보건대, 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 각 증거에 의하면, N, M은 법정에서 피고인의 주장에 부합하는 듯한 진술을 하였으나, N은 사고 바로 다음날 경찰에 진정서를 제출하였고, 경찰에서 피고인으로부터 소주병으로 머리를 맞아 2 바늘 꿰맸다고 진술하면서 다친 부위를 촬영한 사진과 상해 진단서를 제출한 사실, M도 피고인이 빈 소주병을 들고 피해자에게 때리려고 가는 것을 보았다고

In full view of the circumstances that have been agreed after the case and the contents of the statement, the statement of investigation agency is more reliable than the N and M's legal statement.