A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 12, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 12:00 on November 12, 2016, at the Incheon Nam-dong Office Civil Petitions and prisoner meeting waiting room located in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, for the reason that C is prevented from communicating with other prisoners, and (b) is why C is asked inside the match.

In addition, if you show that they are different, they can be seen once.

”라고 소리를 지르고 “ 아이 씨 발, 좃 같은 게 면회도 못하게 하네.

The expression " Does Does Do be Does Does Does Do."

“A person who was asked for, “D. d. d. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f. f.

Recognizing “A” and assaulting the head of “C’s face part at one time.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning prisoners management of correctional officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to C and D;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of E, F, G and H;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following sentencing shall be taken into account, etc.):

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act / [the scope of recommendation] The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act / [the scope of punishment / [the scope of punishment / [the scope of interference with the performance of official duties / the coercion] has no basic area (the period from June to April) (the period from June 1) / [the person subject to special sentencing] / The sentence is one time before the previous year, but is a fine, the defendant is a criminal record, a contingent crime, and