logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.02.18 2015고단5237
사기등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for three years and for one year and six months, respectively.

on the part of the defendant B.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On August 26, 2010, A was sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Regulation of Fraud and Similar Receiving Act at the Seoul Central District Court, and the execution of the sentence was terminated on May 6, 2012.

Defendant

A was placed in the third floor of the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F building with the trade name of (ju)G, ordered Defendant B, etc. to invite investors. Accordingly, Defendant B, etc. to receive 10-15% of the investment fund as a recommendation allowance. The Defendants may distribute a large amount of profit within a short period of time to an unspecified number of people if they make an investment in (ju)G.

Cruelly, it received investment money by the method of "on-line tin", such as cash or inner name.

1. The Defendants in collusion with the victim H at the above (State)G office around March 2014, in order to take over the Defendant’s “(State) apartment complex with usual house,” and may sell it in lots or increase profits from lending.

If one million won is invested in the old account, the profit of KRW 1,200,000 per day shall be returned to the principal of the investment and the profit of KRW 30,000 per day.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the fact is that (State)G did not take over an arm's length green apartment, and it was impossible to realize high profits within a short period because it did not have any assets or profits to pay high profits to investors. Since it is inevitable to take a method of repaying the principal and profits to existing investors by using investment funds received from the next-order investors, and as long as a new investor is not retained, it is not able to pay high profits within a short period, the victim did not have the intent or ability to pay the agreed principal or profits.

Nevertheless, the Defendants conspired to make an investment on March 25, 201 from the victim of the above false language.

arrow