logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.05.08 2014나34692
소유권말소등기
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation in this part are the same as the statement "1. Recognizing facts" in the first instance court's decision, except for the cases in which the facts are written or added as follows. Thus, they are cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The second part of the second part of the judgment of the court of first instance shall add "for the reason of division of property" to "for the reason of division of property".

The following shall be added from the second to nine (1........) of the first instance judgment (1..................).

[Attachment: [Attachment 806С in Pansung-si and 1289С in Pansung-si] The real estate in the annexed list No. 3 was combined on March 8, 2012, and the real estate was stated in the annexed list No. 503С in Pansung-si, and the “Nan-si, Pansung-si” and “Nan-si 489С in the annexed list No. 5 was combined on March 8, 2012 and became real estate in the annexed list No. 5 (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant real estate”) without specifically distinguishing the above real estate lot number before being combined, even in cases where the relevant facts are explained prior to the combination]. The three pages of the judgment of the first instance court (hereinafter referred to as “the facts of recognition,” “paragraph (f) of the same paragraph”) are added as follows:

The plaintiff filed an application for a ruling with this Court No. 2014 seconds2051 against the disposition of non-prosecution (a disposition of non-prosecution) but this Court decided to dismiss the plaintiff's application for a ruling on December 31, 2014."

2. The court's reasoning for this part of the judgment on the cause of the claim is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance court, except where the plaintiff added the rejection judgment on the plaintiff's assertion and the additional evidence submitted in the trial. Thus, this part of the judgment on the cause of the claim is acceptable as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

A. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion is as follows: “The Defendant can re-entire each real estate of this case.”

arrow