beta
Text
1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff for KRW 8,286,00 and 6% per annum from June 27, 2014 to April 9, 2015.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On May 2, 2011, the Plaintiff received construction cost of KRW 180,000,000 (contract amount: KRW 36,000,000) from the Defendants for “D Site Creation Project” (hereinafter “instant construction”).
O Construction cost: A separate statement of additional construction cost, such as a table of the 195,00,000 Won (Additional tax Map)
6. In the event of additional installation on the left-hand side of U-type (300m a concrete pool fume) on the left-hand side, the material price and personnel expenses to be predicted shall be paid by the Defendants in addition.
B. After November 201, the Plaintiff and the Defendants made an agreement on the following (hereinafter “the first agreement”) with respect to the instant construction works: (a) around October 2012, the said agreement was reached; (b) around October 201, the Plaintiff and the Defendants conducted an inspection on the equal heat in the presence of Gap (Defendant C) and Eul (Plaintiffs). (c) In the event that equal heat continues to progress as a result of the inspection, the retaining wall was completely reconstructed, and the same is deemed suspended, the retaining wall was completely reconstructed at concrete rupture repair method. (c) On March 2, 201, the Plaintiff and the Defendants were to deposit KRW 10,000,000 out of the defective performance securities for the completion of the construction (two years) and the remainder thereof; (d) the Plaintiff and the Defendants paid KRW 20,000 to the Plaintiff and the Defendants deposit deposit money without delay upon completion of the conditions set forth in the said paragraph (2).
[Based on the basis of recognition] Unsatisfy, overlaps between Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 11 and other evidence submitted by both parties shall be explained with a focus on Gap evidence for convenience.
The same shall also apply to the following:
each entry, the purport of the whole pleading
2. Assertion and determination
A. The summary of the parties’ assertion 1 Plaintiff 1’s total construction cost: 28,789.