beta
Text
Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.
Reasons
1. On January 28, 2013, Defendant B (criminal record) is a person who was not detained in a crime of fraud at the Seoul Central District Court on January 28, 2013 and whose criminal records are more than twice, including those under trial.
【Criminal Facts】
1. On October 2012, the Defendants, at a law firm F office located in the third floor of the Seocho-gu Seoul E-building in Seocho-gu, 2012, concluded that “The victims G, who served as the chief of the registration team of the said law firm, tried to purchase the purchase price of KRW 11, 112, and 113 in the name of KRW 2,675,000,000,000, and paid the down payment and the intermediate payment, and applied for a loan of KRW 95,00,000,000 as security to pay the remainder amount of KRW 750,000,000,000,000,000,000 won in the territory of the National Bank (hereinafter referred to as “Seoul-gu H building”), was false as follows: acquisition tax and registration expenses, and real estate appraisal expenses.”
However, in fact, the sales contract for the above real estate was concluded at KRW 700 million, and the sales price paid by the defendants was only KRW 20 million, and therefore, it is impossible to obtain a loan from the national bank that applied for a loan to submit evidentiary documents for the payment of down payment of down payment to the national bank. The Defendants did not have any intent or ability to pay the loan normally even if they borrow money from the victim because of the lack of any particular property or income.
On October 10, 2012, the Defendants, by deceiving the victim as above, received 42 million won from the victim to the new bank account in the name of the Defendant A through the J on October 10, 2012, and acquired it by deception.
2. On November 7, 2012, the Defendants made a false statement that “The Defendant would receive a loan from a national bank if the Defendant borrowed money in the amount of KRW 20 million to the victim in the said law firm F office.”
However, the facts are the money from the victim as provided in the above Paragraph 1.