logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2015.06.17 2014고단147
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. Around 15:00 on December 23, 2013, the Defendant: (a) driven the Cpoter freight vehicle from the remote distance of the listing difficulties located in the area of the Cpool-si in the area of the Silsan-si, Silsan-si; and (b) proceeded at approximately 50 km from the surface of the water agricultural and industrial complex to the west waterside of the city.

Since there is a shooting range in which signal lights are installed, there was a duty of care to safely drive the steering and brake system by properly operating the steering and brake system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in proceeding with red signal, and was driven by the victim D (the 53 years old) who was directly in accordance with the new name due to the village d'(the 53 years old) due to the difficulty of listing from the surface of the Maspung Elementary School, and was driven by the victim D(the 53 years old).

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence that caused injury to the victim D, such as scarcitys that need to be treated for about two weeks, and the victim F, who was the passenger aboard the Poter cargo, about 10 weeks of age, about 2/3 of the trend in need of medical treatment, respectively.

2. Defendant’s assertion and judgment

A. The Defendant denies the facts charged to the effect that he did not violate the signal from the police investigation stage to the court, thereby having no occupational negligence.

B. As evidence consistent with the fact that the Defendant violated the signal, there are statements in D and G police and in this court, confirmation of the fact of the D’s accident (investigative record 89 pages), traffic accident occurrence report, actual situation investigation report, and investigation report (the contents of telephone conversations withG).

1 The statement in D police and the summary of the written confirmation of fact of accident in this court is that D is red and that D's signal in the direction of progress is changed from about 10 to 20 meters before the stop line entry to green straight signal.

However, it is the insurance company of the defendant's driver's freight, the insurance company of ELA and the D driver's car insurance company.

arrow