logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.11.18 2015고합295
청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(청소년강간등)
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is as follows: on March 26, 2009, the Defendant discovered the victim C (the age of 17) who was under the influence of alcohol in front of the Dong Office of Standing 2, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, 2009, and followed the victim, and followed the victim, thereby preventing the victim from being injured by one hand, putting other hand into the victim's inner part, and putting the victim's upper part of the victim's outer part, and putting the victim's outer part of the E agency located at approximately 80 meters away from 80 meters away from her inner part, and led the victim into the victim's front part of the E agency located in the same Gu D, and led the victim to the victim's face at a single time, and the victim was able to take part in the victim's outer part, but the victim and the panty part of the victim exceeded the victim's panty.

On the other hand, the defendant's chest and the part of the victim's chest and the part of the defendant's chest continue to rest, and the defendant's boomed the victim's bruth, but the victim refused to do so, thereby harming the victim's sexual organ and self-defense.

In light of the victim's face and clothes, the victim was forced to commit an indecent act.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 7(2) of the former Act on the Protection of Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (wholly amended by Act No. 9765, Jun. 9, 2009; hereinafter the same) and Article 298 of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under the proviso to Article 16 of the former Act on the Protection of Juveniles against Sexual Abuse. According to a written agreement attached to the trial records, the fact that the victim has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the Defendant on November 17, 2015, which is the date of the instant indictment can be acknowledged. Thus, the instant indictment is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow