1. On July 30, 2014, the Defendant filed an investigation report among the non-permission dispositions against the Plaintiff on the part of the Plaintiff.

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff filed a petition for inspection and copy with the purport that B, the respondent, gave up his/her proportional representation call, was a violation of the Public Official Election Act (No. 2014 and No. 595 of the Gwangju District Public Prosecutor's Office). On July 21, 2014, the prosecutor in charge issued a non-guilty disposition against the said petition.

On July 30, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for perusal or copying of investigation reports (C telephone conversations No. B) among the records of the said case, the 6th public notice of public invitation of regional election expenses across the nation of the Dong-si Seoul Metropolitan City, the investigation report (verification of preparation of the record, etc.), and the video recording statement summary.

On July 30, 2014, the Defendant: (a) allowed perusal and copying of the written public notice of the invitation of members of the 6th nationwide local election campaign in Gwangju Metropolitan City, Gwangju Metropolitan City on July 30, 2014; (b) on which the Plaintiff applied for perusal and copying; (c) on other occasions, the Defendant rendered a decision not to allow perusal and copying of the written public notice of the invitation of members of the 6th nationwide local election campaign in Seoul Special Metropolitan City; and (d) on the investigation report (verification of the preparation of the record, etc.), the Defendant issued a decision not to allow perusal and copying (hereinafter referred to as “instant refusal disposition”).

On October 1, 2014, the Plaintiff was dissatisfied with the instant refusal disposition and filed an administrative appeal with the Deliberative Committee on Administrative Appeals with the Gwangju High Prosecutors' Office, and the said Committee dismissed the Plaintiff's appeal on November 26, 2014.

[Ground of recognition] The plaintiff's assertion of the parties to the whole argument, and the plaintiff's assertion of the parties to the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, are requested to disclose the information of this case in order to verify whether there is an objection in the process of recommending candidates for the 6th nationwide City/Si/Gun election of Gwangju Metropolitan City Seoul Metropolitan City Council members. The information of this case does not fall under the information subject to non-disclosure, but is unlawful.