1. With respect to real estate listed in separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2:

A. Defendant B and Nonparty E were concluded on August 26, 2016.

1. On May 10, 2016, the Plaintiff loaned KRW 100,000,000 to Nonparty F with interest free of charge on December 31, 2016.

E has jointly and severally guaranteed the above loan obligation that F bears for the plaintiff.

[Ground of recognition] The entry of Gap evidence No. 1 and the purport of the whole argument

2. Determination as to claims against Defendant B and C

가. 인정사실 1) E은 2016. 8. 26. 처제(妻弟)인 피고 B과 별지 목록 제1, 2항 기재 부동산에 관하여 매매예약을 체결하고, 같은 날 창원지방법원 진주지원 접수 제54868호로 피고 B에게 별지 목록 제1, 2항 기재 부동산에 관하여 소유권이전청구권가등기를 마쳐주었다. 2) E은 2016. 8. 26. 딸인 피고 C과 별지 목록 제 3, 4, 5항 기재 부동산에 관하여 매매예약(E이 2016. 8. 26. 피고 B, C과 별지 목록 제1 내지 5항 기재 부동산에 관하여 체결한 매매예약을 아래에서 ‘이 사건 매매예약’이라 한다)을 체결하고, 같은 날 창원지방법원 진주지원 접수 제54867호로 피고 C에게 별지 목록 제3, 4, 5항 기재 부동산에 관하여 소유권이전청구권가등기를 마쳐주었다.

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 3-3, 3-4, 3-5, 3-9, and 3-10, and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. At the time of the conclusion of the instant promise to sell and purchase, E’s property status is as follows.

(1) In cases where a creditor’s relevant legal doctrine is a monetary claim against a debtor by subrogation in the event that the creditor’s right to the debtor to be preserved by subrogation is a monetary claim, that is, the need to preserve the creditor’s right to the third debtor by subrogation of the debtor only when the debtor is insolvent, the creditor may exercise his/her right to the third debtor on behalf of the debtor. Therefore, the insolvent as a requirement for subrogation of the creditor means that the debtor is not sufficient to pay and, in particular, where it is impossible