logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원안산지원 2014.09.30 2012가단103493
손해배상(산)
Text

1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff for 190,838,630 won and 5% per annum from December 5, 2009 to September 30, 2014.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. (1) From November 26, 2009, the Plaintiff, who was recognized as promoting power distribution promotion, started to work as a daily employee at Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”), and on December 4, 2009, the Defendant Co., Ltd. contracted by the Korea Electric Power Corporation on December 4, 2009, started to work as a special voltage line (22,90 V) cutting and collecting electric wires at the site of the installation of the Incheon DV bicycle lane that the Defendant Co., Ltd. contracted by Korea Electric Power Corporation (hereinafter “instant work”).

The instant work, when cutting electric wires with different majors going on and going on a studs (vehicle with an apparatus to prevent electric shock) from both the three electric poles, the Plaintiff et al. collected electric wires up to three electric poles, extracted electric wires up to three electric poles, and returned electric wires and electric poles to the Korea Electric Power Corporation.

The Plaintiff, at around 11:00 on December 4, 2009, intended to get up electricity to the electric poles while other workers did not block electricity, was contacted with electric wires where the current has not yet been cut off, and crashed.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). The Plaintiff, owing to the instant accident, cut off electric images and cut both arms.

(2) At the time of the instant accident, Defendant C (the representative director of the Defendant Company) or on-site agent E did not work at the site, and did not prepare a work plan containing specific contents of the work plan, such as the scope of work, the necessary matters prior to the commencement of work, and the work plan regarding the blocking of the route. The safety meeting prior to the instant work was not sufficiently conducted

In addition, the persons who participated in the instant work, including the Plaintiff, did not look at the educational data on the guidelines for the static and active vessels, or receive education on the direction of the static and active vessels from the field supervisor, etc., and did not check whether there is anything abnormal protective devices or receive education on the carrying of active vessel access information devices.

-the site chief;

arrow