(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.02.20 2018가합515390

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.02.20 2018가합515390

소유권이전등기

Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) As to each real estate or the indicated shares in the list (attached Form 1), each of the real estate or the indicated shares shall be August 2017.

Reasons

1. On July 22, 1981, the Plaintiff and the Defendant married to 34 years of marriage, and brought up Category D and E (hereinafter “children”). On October 22, 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendant married again on October 27, 2016.

On March 197, the Plaintiff and the Defendant began to operate a motor vehicle maintenance shop specialized in the restoration of the defects of vehicles (hereinafter referred to as “nden”), and they have been growing up to the next round of the business into a corporate entity called C (hereinafter referred to as “C”), and as of the closing date of pleadings, the Plaintiff holds 28.14% of the issued stocks of C, and the Defendant holds 68.34% of the issued stocks.

B AD E Plaintiff and Defendant were married on October 22, 2015 due to the Defendant’s 2011 to her around that time, her “Furine” was due to the Defendant’s her “outstanding.” Second, around September 2016, the Defendant written each of the following contents in the future between the Plaintiff and their children, and the Defendant filed a report of marriage again on October 27, 2016, jointly with the Plaintiff and their children:

(A) The Defendant, who mainly stayed in the early 2016 or around early 2017, was in an internal relationship with the “Gman”. The Plaintiff again demanded a divorce to the Defendant, and the two persons again demanded a divorce to the Defendant, but the discussion on the division of property (the Plaintiff’s property division is 1.5 billion won in cash and the remainder of the couple’s property belongs to the Plaintiff) was conducted on August 18, 2017. However, as between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff on August 18, 2017, the Defendant prepared and notarized each of the following (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant notes”). The discussions on divorce between the two persons were suspended:

B HH I HH H JJ Ha JJ NAJ C LB L but the Defendant was still living together with “Gman” in the early February 2018, even in the early February 2018.

[Ground of recognition] There is no dispute.

유사 판례

-인천지방법원부천지원 2016.02.18 2015가단12996

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.05.25 2016가단5126930

-대구지방법원서부지원 2017.11.15 2017가단3875

-대구지방법원김천지원 2020.08.21 2019가합15796

-부산가정법원 2016.11.29.선고 2016드단5906 판결