A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 18, 2015, the Defendant, while drinking alcohol at D main points located in Chungcheong City C around 00:0 on July 18, 2015, the Defendant: (a) brought a dispute against the Defendant on the ground that the Victim E “I will not be able to satis in any situation; (b) brought the victim out of the main point, she satisfing the ebbbage, sating the victim’s back, she sat down the floor; and (c) assaulted the victim by cutting down the breath of the other victim’s fat on the part of the victim who continued to go beyond the main point; and (d) sating the fat of the other victim’s fat.

2. Whether the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties was asked to ask questions about the details and personal matters of the instant case from a slope G belonging to the F police box of the Chungcheong Police Station, which was called out after having received 112 reports on the instant assault case at the same time and place as the mentioned in the preceding paragraph.

The purpose of this G was to “Is son,” and “Is son,” and “Is son and Cheongs son,” and assaulted the above G by hand, such as “Is son and Cheongs, Is son, and the left-hand shoulder at once.”

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in criminal investigations.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness H, G, E, and I;

1. Each police statement protocol with respect to G and E;

1. Each statement of H and I prepared;

1. Arrest report of the occurrence of the case, notification to the department related to the report of the case of the 112 case, each photograph and video CD;

1. Each investigation report (including accompanying documents) (including accompanying documents) asserts that the defendant was assaulted by the victim E, did not have any fact at the time of E, and that the police officer G was involved in or took a bath to the police officer.

However, E consistently and consistently marks his flabage.

A witness, H and I have observed such a fact.

At the time, considering the photograph taken of the E’s part, there was a flag flance of flag to E, and G also took a bath by the Defendant’s flag and flaging his chest.

E.C.