1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 26, 2007, if the deceased B (CB, hereinafter “the deceased”) who is the plaintiff’s spouse, becomes a stock company located in Gangwon-si, Gangwon-do, 52 (Masan-dong), the principal factory (hereinafter “the factory of this case”) and was in charge of manufacturing equipment operation, repair, and wastewater treatment.

B. On October 18, 2015, the Deceased complained of a serious number of people at 06:0 on Sundays 06:00 on the same day, and then sent to the 1119 Emergency Medical Service Center from the 107:0 on the same day. The Deceased was under emergency operations at the above hospital, such as cerebrovascular, cerebral hemopic chronic chronic chronronic chronic chronronic chronic chronronic chronronic chronronic chronic chrons, cerebral chronic chronic chronic chronic chronics, and rhe was killed on November 22, 2015 when hospitalized in the hospital.

C. The death diagnosis report on the deceased is written as follows: acute cardiopulmonary pulmonary suspension as a direct death; i.e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e.c., e., e.

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant injury and disease,” which is an intermediate event, D.

On February 29, 2016, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to pay survivors’ benefits and funeral expenses. However, on September 1, 2016, the Defendant rendered a decision on the survivors’ benefits and funeral site pay (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that “the death of the Deceased is not recognized as a death due to an occupational disease” on the ground that “the occurrence of a sudden and difficult event or a sudden change in the work environment relating to the work within 24 hours prior to the occurrence of the network is not observed, and the amount and time of the work are not verified to have increased by at least 30% compared to the daily work within one week prior to the occurrence, and it does not fall under the criteria for recognition of short-term and chronic tasks, deeming it as working hours or robbery, and the circumstance that the stress caused by the change of work from the shift is excessive.”

E. The plaintiff.