(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.04.02 2014가합4273

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.04.02 2014가합4273

손해배상(기)

Text

1. The plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant C leased and used the land and ground buildings in Daegu Jung-gu E as a warehouse from Defendant D, the owner thereof (hereinafter “instant warehouse”); and Plaintiff B leased and operated the land and building adjacent to the instant warehouse from Plaintiff A, the owner thereof.

B. A fire (hereinafter “instant fire”) occurred in the instant warehouse on March 29, 2013, around December 12:30, 2013, and the building, facilities, and articles, etc. adjacent to the said warehouse were destroyed by a fire.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 4 and 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the claim

A. The plaintiffs' assertion 1) The fire of this case occurred due to the electricity colon or the employees of Defendant C, etc., after the aging of the warehouse of this case. Accordingly, the defendants are liable to compensate the plaintiffs for the damages caused by the fire of this case.

B. 1) The fact that the fire in this case occurred in the warehouse of this case is examined as seen above. Furthermore, the fact that the fire in this case occurred in the warehouse of this case is examined.As a result of the fact inquiries into the evidence Nos. 6, 8 (including paper numbers, Nos. 4, 7, and the fact inquiries into the vice chief of the sub-police station of the Daegu Metropolitan City of this Court, the fact that the fire in this case was confirmed to have been burned out from the floor of the warehouse of this case and moved to the building in full view of the whole purport of the pleadings as a result of the fact inquiries into the vice chief of the sub-chief of the Daegu Metropolitan City of this Court on the fact that the fire in this case occurred in the investigation of the cause of the fire in this case, the non-party Eul, the wife of the plaintiff D, stated that his employees were tobacco at the time of the investigation of the cause of the fire in this case, and that the non-party Eul, the wife of the plaintiff D, stated that it was the cause of the fire in Daegu Metropolitan City, in view of

유사 판례

-대구고등법원 2016.02.16 2015나1285

-대구지방법원 2015.12.18 2015나4182

-대구지방법원 2017.07.05 2016나309273

-서울북부지방법원 2015.09.24 2014가단100273

-대구지방법원 2019.02.20 2018구합22878