beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. A. On July 2015, the Plaintiff, a corporation engaged in the manufacturing and sales business of water purifiers, etc., was verified directly by the Defendant as “direct production confirmation factory” with the term “water intake equipment (except for the names of household appliances)” as “factory 1 (Yacheon-si, Yacheon-gu, Yacheon-gu, 22, 103 B4 (Sacheon-gu, Yacheon-gu)”, and “term of validity: from July 20, 2015 to July 19, 2017.” (b) The Plaintiff was verified directly from the Defendant, as follows, to supply an equipment using competing products, belonging to the Office of Education of Sejong Special Self-Governing City, the Water Service Headquarters, etc., to be located only in a small and medium enterprise (hereinafter “instant contract”).
(B) After entering into the contract of this case, the term “the product of this case” (hereinafter referred to as “the product of this case”)
supplied. The contract date. The contract price for the quantity of the public institution (supplyer) quantity (on July 17, 2014, KRW 2,720,000 on March 22, 2016, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Water Supply Headquarters on April 29, 2016, the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Water Supply Project Headquarters 1216, August 296, 2016; 208,000
C. On December 29, 2016, the Defendant received a request from the Administrator of the Public Procurement Service to review or re-examine the revocation of direct production, and thereafter hold a hearing on February 2, 2017 to deliberate on the grounds for cancellation of the verification of direct production with respect to the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff refers to the external body body strings among the instant products produced and supplied by the Plaintiff during the hearing process.
Recognizing the fact that the production process, “a cut, cut, cut, or melting,” had a foreign company (A) carry out the activity.
Accordingly, on June 12, 2017, the Defendant was verified directly by the Plaintiff pursuant to Article 11(2)3, (3), and (5)3 of the former Act on Promotion of Purchase of Small and Medium Enterprise Products and Support for Development of Market (amended by Act No. 14839, Jul. 26, 2017; hereinafter “former Act on Support of Development of Market”) as follows.