logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원목포지원 2016.10.27 2016가합10891
보증금반환
Text

1. The Defendant’s payment to the Plaintiffs as stated in the “request amount” column in the attached Table 1 sheet, and as to the money, from May 21, 2016.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On June 26, 2001, the Defendant obtained approval of the business plan under Article 33 of the former Housing Construction Promotion Act (amended by Act No. 6655 of Feb. 4, 2002) and Article 32 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 17816 of Dec. 26, 2002), and constructed H 802 apartment units, a public rental house constructor, on the land of 30,963 square meters of the National Housing Fund.

B. On December 14, 2001, Plaintiff A and B leased each apartment as indicated in the column of “ apartment” in attached Table 1 from each of the Defendant on December 14, 2001, Plaintiff C’s December 12, 2001, Plaintiff D’s December 13, 2001, Plaintiff E leased each apartment as indicated in attached Table 1 from each of the Defendant on July 14, 2010 (hereinafter “each apartment of this case”), and the subsequent lease deposit was changed several times, and finally, the lease deposit was changed as stated in the “deposit” column in the same Table.

(hereinafter “each lease deposit of this case”). C.

On August 28, 2003, the defendant extended a loan from the National Housing Fund to the National Housing Fund with respect to each apartment of this case (hereinafter "each apartment of this case").

As of the date of closing argument of the instant case, the amount of secured debt of each of the instant mortgages is as stated in the National Housing Fund column in attached Table 1.

(hereinafter “each of the instant loans”) D.

On October 4, 2010, the Plaintiffs filed an application for approval for the conversion of each apartment of this case with the Mayor of Yeongdeungpopo City pursuant to Article 21(3) of the former Rental Housing Act (amended by Act No. 10463, Mar. 9, 201; hereinafter the same shall apply) on October 4, 2010, and the Bapo City Mayor, after the appraisal under Article 23 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 22689, Mar. 2, 2011) determined the conversion price of each apartment of this case as the amount indicated in the “sale conversion price” column in attached Table 1 (hereinafter “each pre-sale conversion price”).

arrow