logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.07.22 2015고단1959
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the husband of the victim E (here, 48 years of age).

피고인은 2015. 2. 14. 00:30경 인천 서구 F아파트 동 호 주거지에서, 피해자와 이혼문제로 대화를 하던 중 피해자의 남자친구로 의심되는 성명불상의 남자가 주거지로 찾아오자 격분하여, 위험한 물건인 골프채를 집어 들고 남자를 쫓아가려고 하여 이를 피해자가 제지하자, 골프채로 피해자의 온몸을 때리고, 피고인의 폭행을 피해 현관문 밖으로 도망가는 피해자에게 ‘때리지 않을 테니 들어오라’라는 취지로 말하여, 다시 집안으로 들어온 피해자의 머리채를 잡아 넘어뜨리고 골프채로 피해자의 얼굴, 팔 등 온몸을 때리고 발로 피해자의 몸을 걷어찼다.

As a result, the defendant carried a golf bond, which is a dangerous thing, and inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the two side species requiring treatment for about 70 days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on orders to provide community service and attend lectures;

1. Two years to four years from imprisonment with prison labor for the basic area (the scope of recommendations) of category 1 (the scope of special injury) in the application of the sentencing criteria (the type of crime).

2. The crime of this case in which the sentence of sentence is to be sentenced is to be committed by assaulting the victim who is the defendant's wife without discrimination by golf, hand, or shot, which is a dangerous object, and thereby causing injury in need of medical treatment for about 70 days, and the nature of the crime is very serious.

In particular, the Defendant continued to contact the victim with respect to a divorce suit in progress under the pretext of the agreement on the crime of this case and attempted to approach the victim.

arrow