1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 25, 1984, the Plaintiff entered the Army and was discharged from military service on April 23, 1987.

B. On August 12, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of persons who rendered distinguished services to the State with respect to the Defendant on the following grounds: “Around December 1985, the Plaintiff was treated by the Armed Forces East Sea Hospital because he was knee and knee in the course of combat team training.”

C. On January 13, 2015, the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement deliberated and resolved on the following: “No objective data exists, such as the patient beds where the Plaintiff could have known that the Plaintiff was injured while serving in the military, among knee and knee-free, and no knee-free will be considered to constitute a soldier or policeman on duty and a soldier or policeman’s duty, taking into account the medical opinion that it is difficult to recognize a public duty-related relationship.”

Based on this, on February 10, 2015, the Defendant issued a notice to the Plaintiff on the “decision on the non-conformity of the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State.”

(hereinafter referred to as the “disposition in which the person who rendered distinguished services to the State was not eligible for the State” and “Disposition in which the person who received distinguished services to the State was not eligible for the State,” and the “Disposition in which the person who received distinguished services to the State was not eligible for the State’s compensation” collectively referred to as the “each Disposition in this case’s case’s”

2. Whether each of the dispositions of this case is legitimate

A. The Plaintiff asserted that he was judged Class A in the physical examination conducted before entering the Plaintiff without an open place, and even if he had difficulty in daily life even though he was in the military service, each of the dispositions of this case taken without a proper investigation should be revoked as it is unlawful.

(A) The Plaintiff limited the different parts of the instant case to knenee’s knee’s knee’s knee’s knee’s knee’s knee’s knee’s b.

Judgment

1) The Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (hereinafter “Act”) is limited.

§ 4.