A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Seized evidence 1, 2, or 3 shall be confiscated from the accused.

The costs of lawsuit.

Punishment of the crime

On August 19, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to special larceny, special larceny, and imprisonment for four months or more, and imprisonment for one year or more. On September 18, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor in the same court on September 18, 2014; on April 27, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and two months; on March 2, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to one year or more by imprisonment with prison labor for night building intrusion larceny at the Seoul Western District Court; and on March 2, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to one year by imprisonment with prison labor for night building intrusion larceny at the Seoul Western District Court.

1. On May 15, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed larceny of a structure at night against the victim C; (b) opened and intruded the entrance door at the “E restaurant in the operation of the victim located in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si; and (c) opened and intrudes the entrance door in an unreshing manner; and (d) cut off the cash amount of KRW 70,000,000,000 owned by the victim within the payment period of the Kashter’s cash withdrawal.

L. A. L. theft was committed.

2. A thief who intrudes on a structure at night against the victim F. The Defendant: (a) up to 01:11:01 on the same day as paragraph (1) of this Article; (b) up to 01:14, at the “H in the operation of the victim located G in Seocheon-si, Seocheon-si, the Defendant: (c) opened and intruded the entrance entrance at the place where the supervision over the surrounding area was neglected; (d) opened and intruded by using keyss; and (e) collected KRW 226,00 in cash, which is owned by the victim during the period of cash withdrawal at the location of the carcter

L. A. L. theft was committed.

In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by this Court, the fact that a person who committed the above crime is the defendant is sufficiently recognized.

Each of the above crimes appears to have been committed by the same person in view of the date and time and place of each crime, method of crime, and CCTV images and photographs revealed at the time of each crime, and the time of and after the crime, and the whole of the CCTV images and photographs taken by the offender. As a result of the reverse tracking of the crime, around 22:15 on May 14, 2017, the defendant was living at the time.