1. The defendant is paid KRW 296,141,560 from the plaintiff and at the same time, the list of real estate in attached Form 1.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a corporation established on May 21, 2013 with housing construction and real estate sales business as its main purpose business.

B. On July 19, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Ulsan Metropolitan City Mayor for approval of the housing construction project plan with respect to the construction of 11 units of privately-owned apartment units 1,182 units on the ground of Ulsan-gu, and 286 parcel 49,860 square meters (hereinafter “instant project site”).

(hereinafter above, the Plaintiff’s housing construction project is “instant project”). C.

The Ulsan Metropolitan City Mayor approved the instant project plan on February 26, 2014, and around that time, determined a single unit area of 81,705 square meters adjacent to the instant project site as a district unit planning zone, including the instant project site, and publicly announced the approval of the instant project plan on March 6, 2014, and publicly announced the purport of the determination of the district unit planning zone and topographic drawings.

The defendant on June 19, 1987 attached Form

1. The registration of ownership transfer was completed by acquiring ownership of each real estate entered in the real estate list.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant real estate”). 【No dispute exists concerning each of the real estate listed in the same list / [based on recognition], entry of Gap evidence 1-1, 2, 2, 7, and 10, and the court’s inquiry results on Ulsan Metropolitan City, the purport of the entire pleadings, as a whole.

2. The parties' assertion

A. Plaintiff 1) The Plaintiff obtained approval for the instant project from Ulsan Metropolitan City and secured the right to use at least 95% of the instant project site. (2) The Plaintiff did not enter into a negotiation on the instant real estate transaction for three months since the commencement of a prior negotiation, such as notifying the Defendant of the commencement of compensation consultation on the instant real estate.

3. Ultimately, the Plaintiff met the requirements for the right to demand sale under Article 18-2 of the Housing Act. Accordingly, based on the above provision, the Plaintiff’s real estate at the time when more than three months have elapsed since the commencement of the negotiations.