logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.01.23 2019고단2938
근로기준법위반등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment for two months.

However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Justice] On October 8, 2018, Defendant B was sentenced to two years of suspended sentence of imprisonment for a violation of the Labor Standards Act at the Incheon District Court on June 1, 2019, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 1, 2019.

【Criminal Facts】

The Defendants 2019 order- 2938- The Defendants 1 are the representatives of E Co., Ltd. located in the Seo-gu Incheon Metropolitan Building D, and are full-time workers who run the construction business by using 15 workers. On April 14, 2017, the Defendants 2: (a) under a contract for new construction of Go Chang-gun apartment in Jeollabuk-gun, Jeollabuk-do; (b) the individual constructor who did not obtain a construction license; (c) the subcontractor who subcontracted the construction of reinforced concrete among the above construction; and (d) Defendant B is a person who runs a personal construction business without a construction business license from the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City I Apartment-gu, and (e) was sub-subcontracted

1. Defendant B from June 20, 2018 to June 20, 2018

7. 8. K’s wages of KRW 2,375,00,00 for the total amount of eight workers, as well as KRW 12,015,00,00 for each worker, until August 1, 200, was not paid within 14 days from the retirement date of each worker.

2. Defendant A from June 20, 2018 to June 20, 2018

7. Until August 7, 198, K’s wages of KRW 2,375,00,000, including the wages of KRW 12,015,00 for the total eight workers, as shown in the annexed Crime List, did not pay the total wages of KRW 12,000 to each worker within 14 days from the date of his retirement.

The defendant A-the representative of E, a person who entered into a contract for new construction of officetels with M, the owner of the building site of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Ltel, and the victim N, the representative ofO, who did not receive construction cost but did not exercise the right of retention at the above site. The defendant and the victim also did the above site.

arrow