logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2021.03.11 2020고단5354
공용물건손상등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 20, 2020, the Defendant: (a) visited the C District District District in Seo-gu, Gwangju on September 20, 2020, without any justifiable reason, in order for police officers visiting and working at the C District in the situation, to enter “influences to wear garro or 19 and personal information of visitors,” the Defendant requested the police officers to enter “influences.”

Maskn's Meskn's Meskn's Meskn's Meskn's Meskn's Meskn's Meskn'

D 어딨냐

The term "I" has been rapeed by a police officer at the request of the police officer who does not have any fluort, who does not have any fluort, in the absence of any fluort.

"A police officer who asks a specific report, such as a sound book and a person's personal information, shall be identified."

The "Who-do" continuously flags, such as voice, and the police officer removed it, and the police flabs equivalent to the 66,000 won attached to the entrance, which were laid down at the glass door to strengthen large plastic paintings located adjacent to the entrance, and damaged goods used by public offices by destroying the fire amounting to 60,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the police in relation to the defendant's legal statement E;

1. The application of each investigation report (applicable to the verification of video-recordinging images of the earth's CCTV system, the type of crime, a written estimate of damage, and receipts (related to a document attached to a written estimate of damage), the application of the relevant Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 141 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 141 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act, has a record of committing a crime several times in drinking, and the instant crime is committed under the influence of drinking again during the period of suspension of execution due to a crime, such as damage to public goods, even though he/she had been sentenced two times to a suspended sentence of imprisonment due to a crime of damage to public goods.

arrow