logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.06.16 2016고정1155
교통사고처리특례법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is a person engaging in driving service of Bbeer or passenger cars.

On November 17, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle around 19:00, and proceeded at a speed of about 10km from the main park to the home plug in the front of D in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon.

A person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to accurately operate the boom and left and right of the motor vehicle and the steering and steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant failed to discover the Victim E (24 tax, south) and the Victim F (23 tax, leisure) who walked around the same place due to negligence while driving the vehicle as it was, and received the front part of the left side of the vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the victims a loss requiring two-day medical treatment, such as the catum cat, respectively.

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-violation of an intention: The main sentence of Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents;

B. On April 14, 2016, the prosecution of this case, the victim E and F want not to be punished against the defendant, and submission of a written withdrawal of complaint.

Judgment dismissing Public Prosecution: Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act

arrow