Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is a person engaging in driving service of Bbeer or passenger cars.
On November 17, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle around 19:00, and proceeded at a speed of about 10km from the main park to the home plug in the front of D in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon.
A person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to accurately operate the boom and left and right of the motor vehicle and the steering and steering system.
Nevertheless, the Defendant failed to discover the Victim E (24 tax, south) and the Victim F (23 tax, leisure) who walked around the same place due to negligence while driving the vehicle as it was, and received the front part of the left side of the vehicle.
As a result, the Defendant suffered from the victims a loss requiring two-day medical treatment, such as the catum cat, respectively.
2. Determination
(a) Crimes of non-violation of an intention: The main sentence of Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents;
B. On April 14, 2016, the prosecution of this case, the victim E and F want not to be punished against the defendant, and submission of a written withdrawal of complaint.
Judgment dismissing Public Prosecution: Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act