1. Defendant B’s KRW 509,000,000 as well as 5% per annum from October 16, 2015 to October 13, 2016 to the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff's claim for damages due to the plaintiff's tort against the defendants

A. The Defendants asserted against the Plaintiff’s assertion that they would be able to obtain a large amount of profit from the Plaintiff, as well as from the Plaintiff, even if they received money from the Plaintiff in connection with Defendant B’s heavy automobile sales business, and they did not have the intent or ability to pay the investment principal, and thus, they would be able to obtain a large amount of profit from the Plaintiff when they jointly invest in the purchase fund of high-class automobile. Accordingly, the Plaintiff is jointly obligated to pay the Plaintiff the investment principal and profit from the Plaintiff when they invest in the purchase fund of high-class automobile. From July 8, 2013 to April 7, 2014, the Defendants received a total of KRW 513,00,000 from several occasions as the purchase fund of high-class automobile sales in relation to Defendant B’s heavy automobile sales business, and acquired it by fraud, and thereby, incurred damages equivalent to the above amount to the Plaintiff. Accordingly, the Defendants are jointly and severally obligated to pay damages to the Plaintiff due to the tort.

B. According to the reasoning of each of the evidence Nos. 1, 5 through 9, 11, 3-1, 2, 4-1 through 20, 10, 10, and 12-1 through 3 of the evidence Nos. 1, 3-2, and 4-1 through 20, 10, 10, and 12 of the evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the Plaintiff made an investment with Defendant B as a seller of a heavy automobile around May 2013, and Defendant B agreed to pay to the Plaintiff the principal of the investment by selling a heavy automobile purchased, and the Plaintiff agreed to pay to the Plaintiff the principal of the investment by selling the automobile. In accordance with the foregoing agreement, the Plaintiff may receive a total of KRW 963,520,00 from July 8, 2013 to April 7, 2014, and receive only the remainder of KRW 454,500,00 from Defendant C’s account under its wife.

However, the above facts and the evidence presented by the plaintiff alone are related to the automobile sales business of Defendant B.