Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On November 11, 2019, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the Hongsung Branch of the Daejeon District Court.

【Criminal Facts】

On May 23, 2020, at around 00:02, the Defendant driven the E-mail vehicle with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.161% under the influence of alcohol in the three-lane section from the front of the dormitory B in the Incheon pool-gun to the day before the D sales outlet located in C.

Accordingly, the defendant, who violated the Road Traffic Act prohibiting driving under the influence of alcohol, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol in violation of the Road Traffic Act.

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the results of the crackdown on drinking-driving and the circumstantial statement of the drinking-driving driver;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records, etc., investigation reports, and investigation reports (verification of the same type of power);

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that even though the Defendant had been punished for a drunk driving, he/she re-driving at the time when six months have passed thereafter, and the blood alcohol concentration measured is also very high.

However, it shall be considered as favorable factors such as the fact that there is no record of crime other than two times of fine, and the fact that a person is not driving under drinking again, and other factors of sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the age, character and conduct, etc. of the defendant, shall be determined by taking into account the various sentencing conditions in the records of this case,