logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원여주지원 2020.11.17 2020고단1119
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On November 17, 201, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2,50,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) from an Ansan District Court’s Ansan Branch on November 17, 2011.

【Criminal Facts】

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in a SP area B.

1. On August 22, 2020, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) was waiting to drive the said car under the influence of alcohol level of 0.129% on August 22, 202 and turn to the left at the entrance of C Apartment at the entrance of the apartment at the inn city.

Since there is a place where the center line of yellow-ray is installed, a person engaged in driving service shall not drive under the influence of alcohol, and there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the steering and steering system and accurately manipulating the steering and steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive normally due to influence of drinking, and was negligent in driving at the center line as it was, and led to the negligence of driving at a normal driving on the opposite lane, and received the part prior to driving of the victim D driving car, which was under normal driving at the opposite lane, as the front part of the car driven by the Defendant.

The Defendant suffered injury to the victim by occupational negligence during approximately two weeks of treatment, such as salvinal sale, which requires treatment.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol by 0.129% in a section of about 5 km from the date and place specified in paragraph (1), in front of the G convenience store located in the F in the Triju City to the entrance and front intersection of the H apartment at the same time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on the detection of drunk driving by the police statement of D, a notification of the results of the crackdown on drunk driving, an investigation report (report on the circumstances), an investigation report (application of the Bamark type), an investigation report, and an accident video;

arrow