Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a two-wheeled vehicle C.

On November 12, 2014, the Defendant driven the above two-wheeled vehicle on the 15:30 on November 12, 2014, and proceeded in the direction of the driving distance in the direction of the driving distance from the direction of the full distance along the three-lanes in front of the E Hospital located in Daegu North-gu D.

At the same time, there is a crosswalk in which signal lights are installed, so a person engaged in driving a two-wheeled motor vehicle has a duty of care to safely drive a motor vehicle in accordance with the new subparagraph by accurately operating the front door and the left door and the left door and the steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and got a bicycle front part of the victim F (F, 70 years old) who gets a bicycle or a crosswalk on the right side of the right side of the direction, in accordance with pedestrian signals, by negligent negligence in driving in violation of signal, and received the front part of the two-wheeled automobile.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury, such as fulverization of flavers to the right side, which requires approximately 16 weeks of treatment, due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on the actual condition of a traffic accident;

1. Two CCTV CDs;

1. A defendant's response to a request for appraisal [the defendant has violated the signal and has not violated the signal;

The argument is asserted.

However, the victim was a victim of the instant accident, where he / she collapseed on the crosswalk in accordance with the pedestrian signals.

It is consistently stated from investigative agencies to this court.

According to CCTV images taken in the situation at the time of the accident, the location of CCTV camera does not accurately check the face of the instant accident in the columns, etc. However, the victim started to collapse the crosswalk in accordance with pedestrian signals using bicycles at a point of four seconds from the CCTV image time, and at a point of eight seconds from the road.