logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.04.22 2015가합52876
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a juristic person established for each business purpose in the manufacturing of refined, distilled, heat exchangeers, and gas generators, and the Defendant is a juristic person that manufactures semiconductor equipment and related parts.

B. On May 10, 2012, the Defendant entered into a contract for the manufacture of prototypes of the heat exchange block, which is part of the heat exchange apparatus block produced by the Defendant, with the manufacturing volume “gold 3SE (2 set, presses 1 set), 1SET (1 set, 40 parts), and 14.6 million won for the manufacturing price, respectively.

C. After that, the Plaintiff accepted the said manufacturing contract and completed the production of gold and prototype on April 16, 2013, and received the price from the Defendant in full.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence No. 1, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. In light of the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the cause of the claim, the Plaintiff produced 3,00 heat exchange block pursuant to the agreement with the Defendant, and the Defendant is obligated to pay the said 3,00 block to the Plaintiff.

예비적으로, 피고는 원고에게 월 3,000대의 열교환기 블록을 발주하겠다고 약속하여 이를 믿은 원고로 하여금 연구개발비 등 비용을 들여 3,000대의 열교환기 블록을 만들게 한 후, 원고가 개발 중인 개량된 열교환기 블록에 대한 특허를 가로챈 것을 기화로 원고를 거래관계에서 배제하고자 발주량을 낮추고 단가 인하, 독점 공급계약 등을 요구하였는바, 이는 불법행위에 해당한다.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 60 million won (=20,000 won x 3000) which is equivalent to the exchange value of 30,000 heat exchange block produced by the plaintiff with an agreed amount or tort damages, and damages for delay.

3. Determination

(a)each entry of Gap's 3 to 8, 20 evidence, Eul's 1 to 7 (including paper numbers) and Gap's testimony;

arrow