1. The plaintiffs' appeals against the defendant are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

purport.

1. In the first instance court’s trial scope, the Plaintiff filed a claim against the Defendant for payment of KRW 45,384,615, respectively, and damages for delay.

The court of first instance dismissed the plaintiffs' claim against the defendant in its entirety. Accordingly, with respect to the part of KRW 133,636,363 of the part against the plaintiffs in the judgment of the court of first instance as to the part against the plaintiffs in the judgment of the court of first instance as to KRW 29,090,90 among the part against the above plaintiffs in the judgment of the court of first instance, the judgment of this court is limited to the part against the above plaintiffs.

2. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance that the court should explain this part of the basic facts

1.(c)

The following shall be added to the grounds for recognition of the above 1.3 above, and the part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is the same as that of the basic facts of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, and it shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, in addition to adding "the description of evidence A 5, the fact inquiry results on the actual market of this court, and the results of the party principal examination of the

D. Around 2009, after the period of receipt of the application for ascertaining the truth (from December 1, 2005 to November 30, 2006), the Plaintiffs reported to the effect that the deceased was a victim of a civilian-scart incident, such as the Korean Film Association, etc. at the time of Jinju, and on July 2009, Jinju prepared a regional fact-finding statistics sheet (Evidence A5) on the purport that the deceased died in connection with a civilian-scart incident, such as the Tong-gu Residents' Report Association, etc., which was located on the optical map in the 2009 as of July 1, 1950, according to the project plan for the fact-finding based on which the truth-finding was established. There was no subsequent measure for the result of the basic fact-finding thereafter).

3. The parties' assertion and judgment

A. The 1st Plaintiffs alleged by the parties did not request the truth-finding because they knew of the fact that the investigation was conducted on the case of civilian scarcitys, such as the Federation of the People's Report System.