logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 서부지원 2018.05.23 2018고단56
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 10, 2017, around 06:00, the Defendant was required to return home from D to a police officer belonging to the Busan Hamba, who received a report that the Defendant was not in a taxi, before the Busan Hamba, located in B, the Defendant was in need of returning home from D.

Therefore, on the ground that the Defendant shouldered himself, the Defendant committed assault against the said D on the ground that he was flashing, “I am flag, I am flag, v., and flab,” and that he was flabing the body of the said D with flabing and flabing flabing the blab in two instances of flashing, and

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case with the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not consistent with the nature of the crime of assaulting police officers who perform official duties by taking account of the circumstances that are disadvantageous to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant has been punished for violent crimes, several times, etc., and that the defendant has committed the crime of this case, and the defendant has a deep variety of times, and the defendant has taken into account the favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant has been punished for violent crimes, as well as the fact that the defendant has been fined one time between the last ten years, and the records of this case and all other sentencing conditions shown in the process of the change thereof, and the punishment as set forth in the order shall be determined by comprehensively taking account of

arrow