logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.05.19 2015가단3337
횡령금
Text

1. As to KRW 70,200,000 and KRW 24,800,00 among them, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 15,40,000 from January 23, 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On April 2, 2013, the Plaintiff, at the Defendant’s recommendation, established C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “C”) for the purpose of importing and selling automobiles.

나. 피고는 원고에게 푸조, 시트로엥 자동차를 수입하는 업체인 한불모터스 주식회사(이하 ‘한불모터스’라 한다)로부터 차량 판매권한(딜러권)을 취득하기 위하여 한불모터스의 D를 포함하여 한불모터스 임직원 등에게 로비를 하여야 한다며 5,000만 원을 요구하였고, 이에 따라 원고는 2013. 3.경 피고에게 5,000만 원을 지급하였다.

Since then, the defendant provided D with KRW 10 million as a street, but D refused it and returned KRW 10 million to C's account in the name of staff E on May 6, 2013.

The defendant re-transfered KRW 10 million from the account C on the same day to E, and received the payment of KRW 10 million from E.

다. C는 2013. 5. 3. 한불모터스와 사이에 ‘푸조 딜러쉽 계약’을 체결하고, 그 무렵부터 한불모터스로부터 푸조, 시트로엥 차량을 공급받아 부산, 경남 지역의 소비자들에게 판매하였다. 라.

On the other hand, C’s collaborative company paid part of the repair amount to C under the pretext of the honorarium, and the Defendant deposited part of the above honorarium received from the collaborative company into C’s employee F’s employee F’s passbook and managed and used it.

E. On August 2014, the Plaintiff transferred the entire shares and goodwill of G to G, and the Defendant, during the said transfer process, returned KRW 10 million from D, and confirmed the fact that he managed and used the honorarium from the subcontractor.

Since then, when the Plaintiff demanded the Defendant to return the above amount, the Defendant paid the Plaintiff KRW 50 million in four installments on October 23, 2014, in the amount of KRW 50 million on October 30, 2014, and KRW 15.4 million on the 30th day of each month from November 30, 2014 to January 30, 2015.

arrow