The sentencing of a criminal defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a doctor who manages the Canstal Department in Daegu Jung-gu B.

The Defendant had been aware of the fact that the Defendant could not claim medical care benefit costs even before and after the operation related to the procedure, even though he/she received medical care benefit costs, in the case of vision correction methods to replace the safety, contact lenses, etc. at the above C bills that he/she manages, and thus, he/she had been aware that medical care costs cannot be claimed for non-benefit benefits.

On August 25, 2012, the Defendant filed a claim for medical care benefit cost of KRW 13,300 with the National Health Insurance Corporation, as it received medical treatment as D's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving an employee whose name is unknown, received the amount of KRW 13,30 from April 4, 2012 to July 1, 2013, by unfairly claiming KRW 22,96,220 from April 4, 2012 to July 1, 2013, and KRW 422,30 from 22,147 to 28 medical care benefit costs, as stated in the attached crime list, and received the amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written accusation;

1. Application of each list, medical records, and copies of medical care benefit costs to Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. A fine of three million won to be imposed on the person under the suspension of sentence;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act (amount converted per day: 100,000 won);

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decisions 201Do1119, Jan. 1, 2011>