Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

An automobile (including a towed automobile manufactured for the purpose of moving on land with a dog) shall not be operated unless it is registered in the register of automobiles.

Nevertheless, around November 2017, the Defendant, at the entrance of Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, had connected to BKaren-si, which was not registered in the register of automobiles, and operated by the Defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. C’s legal statement;

1. Filing an accusation against a violation of the Motor Vehicle Management Act, filing an investigation report (vehicle inquiry), an investigation report (limited to an evidentiary document attached to a suspect's bitr operation, an investigation report (verification of a suspect's vehicle) (applicable to the verification of a vehicle owned by a suspect A), and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to an investigation report (verification of change

1. Article 80 of the Motor Vehicle Management Act applicable to criminal facts, Articles 80 subparagraph 1 and 5 of the Motor Vehicle Management Act, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

1. Judgment on the defendant's argument under Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the argument is that the Defendant only operated the relevant Traler by linking it to the Tracker, an agricultural machine (Article 2 subparagraph 2 of the Enforcement Decree of the Automobile Management Act), but not operated by linking it to the motor vehicle, and only the lac attached to the motor vehicle to prevent theft.

2. In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the defendant can sufficiently recognize the fact that the defendant operated the relevant stroper by linking it to a motor vehicle other than agricultural machinery.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

(a) The head of the vehicle actually moves to a vehicle is not considered to have been exposed to the vehicle;

However, there are many photographs connected to the motor vehicle at different places of each set, and the number of photographs is 6,7,37 through 42 of the evidence record.