logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.07.07 2017가단7090
건물명도 및 임대료 지급
Text

1. The defendant shall each issue to the plaintiff in sequence 1, 2, 3, 6, and 1 of the annexed drawings among the 1st floor of the building listed in the annexed list.

Reasons

Facts of recognition

On August 4, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) with the Defendant on the following terms: (a) regarding the portion (A) part (2,00,000 square meters in a ship (hereinafter “instant leased building”) (hereinafter “instant leased building”) that connects each point of the attached drawings Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, and 1 among the 1st floor of the building listed in the attached Table owned by the Plaintiff, with the terms that ① the lease deposit amount of KRW 2,00,000, ② the lease term of KRW 12 months from August 4, 2012, ③ the monthly rent of KRW 230,000, respectively (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

The Defendant occupied the instant leased building under the instant lease agreement, and the instant lease agreement was implicitly renewed after the termination of the instant lease agreement.

From September 15, 2015, the Defendant continued to pay the Plaintiff the monthly rent under the instant lease agreement, and the electricity fee imposed was also unpaid.

On September 1, 2016, the Plaintiff terminated the instant lease agreement to the Defendant on the ground that the monthly rent for at least 13 months is overdue by content-certified mail.

‘A' expresses his intention, and the above content-certified mail was served on the defendant around that time.

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of determination, the instant lease agreement was lawfully terminated on September 1, 2016, and barring any special circumstance, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant leased building to the Plaintiff, barring any special circumstance.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow