The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. In full view of the evidence duly submitted by the prosecutor to the investigation agency of the victim, that is, the statements made by the court below at the court below in F, H, and D, the facts charged of this case in which the defendant, while the defendant and D, and the victim, who were in dispute with each other with vision attached between the defendant and the victim, injured the victim by shaking the victim's neck, can be found, but the court below found the facts erroneous and found the defendant not guilty.

2. Determination

A. On September 16, 201, the Defendant: (a) around 13:30 on September 16, 201, d and the victim E (year 21) opened a crosswalk in front of a three-distance radius adjacent to the Southern-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Seoul; and (b) around the 13:30 on September 16, 201.

Accordingly, while the defendant and D or the victim E have a dispute with each other, the defendant left the neck of the victim's neck with his arms, and brought about about about about two weeks of treatment to the victim, the defendant left the inner left part, the left part, the left part, and the knife seat of the victim in need of treatment.

B. The court below held that ① at the time, D, F, G, and H observed a dispute between the Defendant and the victim at the close distance from the Defendant and the victim; ② at the court of the court below, D stated in the court of the court below that “There is no fact that the Defendant displayed the victim’s neck on his arms, but the Defendant only stated that “the Defendant was satisfing the victim’s chest in order to remove the victim’s chest by the shoulder,” ③ at the investigation agency, F stated that “the Defendant was not deemed to have been satfing the victim’s neck in his arms,” and at the court of the court of the court below, the court of the court below stated that “It is difficult to clearly distinguish whether the Defendant was satfing or satisfing the back part of the part of the victim,” and ④ in the court of the court of the court below, that “The Defendant did not satisfing the victim’s chest.”