All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. The defendant asserts that the summary of the grounds for appeal is unfair because the punishment sentenced by the court below (one year and four months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, and the prosecutor asserts that the above punishment is too uneasible and unfair.

2. It is recognized that each of the crimes of this case committed each of the crimes of this case committed the crime of this case even though the defendant had been punished several times due to the same crime, and committed the crime of this case even though he had committed a repeated crime due to the same crime even though he had been punished several times.

However, considering the fact that the Defendant recognized each of the crimes in this case and against the mistake, the fact that the person with a disability in the third degree is the person with a disability in delay, etc., as favorable to the Defendant, and the fact that it is difficult to view the building name confirmation, etc. submitted by the Defendant in the trial as materials to be considered in sentencing. In full view of the following circumstances, the Defendant’s age, character, environment, motive and background of the crime, means and method of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., as well as the conditions for sentencing indicated in the argument and the record, it cannot be deemed that the sentence

Therefore, the defendant and the prosecutor's argument are not accepted.

3. The appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor in conclusion are without merit, and all of them are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.