logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.08.28 2013가단5151249
구상금
Text

1. The instant lawsuit between the Plaintiff and the Defendant A becomes final and conclusive as a substitute for conciliation on February 21, 2014.

Reasons

1. The following facts are apparent in the records of this case:

On November 5, 2013, the Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit against Defendant A, which is liable for damages as a structure possessor, and against Defendant A, which is liable for damages under the Product Act, against the Defendant corporation, and this court decided to refer the instant case to the conciliation on January 7, 2014.

B. On February 3, 2013, the conciliation date of the instant conciliation case (this Court 2014ss.500827), “Defendant Corporation shall be paid KRW 148 million to the Plaintiff until March 10, 2014, and in the event that the date of the payment expires, the amount of money not paid up to that time and the amount calculated at 20% per annum from March 11, 2014 to the date of full payment shall be paid. The Plaintiff waives both the remainder of the claim against Defendant Corporation and the claim against Defendant A. The litigation costs and the conciliation costs shall be borne by each party.”

C. On February 6, 2014, the Plaintiff served the original copy of the said decision on February 5, 2014; Defendant A was each served on February 5, 2014; Defendant Latn Co., Ltd. on February 10, 2014; Defendant Latn submitted a written objection against the said decision on February 18, 2014; however, the Plaintiff and Defendant A did not raise an objection with the lapse of two weeks from the date on which the original copy of the decision was served.

2. According to the facts of recognition as to the termination of the instant lawsuit between the Plaintiff and the Defendant A, the part between the Plaintiff and the Defendant among the instant lawsuit was concluded on February 21, 2014 when the decision in lieu of the said conciliation was delivered to both the Plaintiff and the Defendant A and the two weeks later.

Therefore, in order to clarify the termination of the instant lawsuit between the Plaintiff and the Defendant A, a declaration of the termination of the lawsuit is made, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow