1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Claims and issues

A. A. Around September 25, 2000, there was no detailed explanation that the Plaintiff’s assertion would have received any treatment from the Defendant at the Gangnambuk Hospital, and there was no treatment prior to the treatment, and there was no explanation that the treatment might have been delayed.

The defendant, while diagnosing and treating the plaintiff, sold the plaintiff's wife.

Accordingly, around July 31, 200, symptoms caused by the primary medical accident, which was in C’s childbirth, have deteriorated, led to a purification of noise, cirratitis, etc., and the state of disease, such as various quality, has deteriorated with negative impacts on the state of malodor due to marc fever.

The defendant is liable to the extent of 10% for all symptoms incurred to the plaintiff during the past 10 years.

B. The defendant's assertion was in a state where the defendant's wife was not dead at the time of treatment on September 25, 2000, and it is not so.

Even if at the time, the defendant did not give any treatment to the plaintiff to the extent that the plaintiff might be treated.

The statute of limitations has expired.

C. At the time of September 25, 200, the issue was whether the Plaintiff’s wife was frighted as the Defendant’s medical treatment place, and whether the Defendant explained the Plaintiff to the Plaintiff. On September 25, 2000, the issue was determined as of September 25, 200, the Defendant’s medical treatment place without explaining the fright, and it cannot be acknowledged that the Plaintiff’s treatment place was frighted by advertising the Plaintiff’s fright.

Therefore, without examining whether the statute of limitations has expired, the plaintiff's assertion cannot be accepted.

The grounds are as follows:

The evidence submitted by the plaintiff is the records of medical treatment at the time of treatment on September 25, 200 and post-treatment, examination records, diagnosis records, medical prescriptions, documents or joints prepared by the plaintiff.

However, it is not enough to recognize the fact that the defendant was satisfing the plaintiff's wife with Gap evidence No. 1.

Other evidence is diagnosed and examined by several medical clinics for a long time due to the symptoms or other symptoms of the plaintiff's assertion.