1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Basic Facts

1) On July 14, 1994, the Plaintiff entered into a microcredit guarantee contract with the term of insurance from July 14, 1994 to September 13, 1997, with the term of insurance from July 14, 1994, and with the amount of insurance as KRW 25,30,000, and issued the microcredit guaranty insurance policy with the above contents on the same day. B borrowed KRW 23,00,000 from the Japanese Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. based on the above guaranty insurance policy on July 15, 1994, B delayed the payment of interest on the above loan from October 20, 2014, and the Japanese Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. claimed insurance money from the Plaintiff on the ground that an insurance accident occurred on or around February 20, 1995, the Plaintiff paid insurance money to the Plaintiff on March 17, 1995, KRW 24,665,265.

3) In the case of the Daejeon District Court 2010Kadan1170 claim between the Plaintiff and B, the above court rendered a ruling on June 4, 2010 that "B shall pay to the Plaintiff the amount calculated at the rate of 19% per annum from August 23, 1999 to the date of full payment of KRW 46,391,05,052 and its KRW 24,645,206, and the above ruling became final and conclusive around that time. The Defendant leased KRW 17,00,000 from B on February 25, 1994 the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter referred to as the "loan of this case") from B, and paid the lease deposit to B around that time, and obtained the fixed date of lease agreement from May 23, 1995.

2) On December 16, 200, the Defendant completed the registration of housing lease (hereinafter referred to as the “registration of housing lease of this case”) under the order of lease on December 16, 200 (the Daejeon District Court Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch

(2) The Plaintiff’s claim for the refund of the lease deposit against the Defendant’s assertion as to the purport of the entire pleadings, including the fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, the evidence No. 1-4, the evidence No. 1-2, the evidence No. 3-1 through 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings.