1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

1. The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, in addition to the part concerning the defendant's argument stated between the 5th and 6th and 21 of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part concerning the judgment of the court of first instance concerning the defendant's argument is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this part is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article

[Attachment ] According to Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 20 (including number 20), the non-party company received automobile parts from the defendant on March 7, 2007 and supplied them to other business Korea Co., Ltd. on the form, upon the request of other business Korea Co., Ltd., the defendant formed a production corporation whose name is identical to that of the non-party company and agreed to deliver automobile parts to the non-party company under the name of other business Korea Co., Ltd. The defendant's representative director may request the non-party company to seize or mortgage on the property (movable and real estate) of the non-party company if the non-party company remains in arrears for three or more years, and the defendant supplied goods to the non-party company under the above contract from June 30, 2008 to July 1, 2009, the non-party company's total amount of KRW 98,000,000 for the non-party company's goods to be paid to the non-party company on the 20th of 2010,2019.